Faresay
Therapy, matched.

Security & Data Protection Policy

DRAFT — for professional sign-off Faresay Ltd·25 June 2026

⚠️ DRAFT v0.1 — for security + legal review. NOT legal advice. Must be validated before use. Last updated: [PLACEHOLDER: date]

Faresay Security & Data Protection Policy

Faresay operates an online therapy / mental-health marketplace that connects clients with licensed mental-health professionals. Because the Platform handles mental-health information — among the most sensitive categories of personal data that exist — Faresay applies a correspondingly high standard of security and data protection across its people, processes and technology.

This policy sets out the controls Faresay maintains to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the data it processes. It is written to support:

This policy should be read alongside the Privacy Policy, the Terms of Service, the Therapist Agreement, and the shared CONTEXT.md fact sheet. It is an internal operational policy; client-facing commitments live in the Privacy Policy.

⚠️ COUNSEL / SECURITY — overarching note. This is a first draft for review. Faresay is bootstrapped and early-stage; several controls below describe a target state rather than a control that is fully implemented today. Each section flags where this is the case. Counsel and a security specialist must validate scope, the UK/EU vs US data-residency model, the controller / processor / covered-entity / business-associate analysis, and all breach-notification obligations before this policy is relied upon.


1. Purpose & scope

1.1 Purpose

This policy defines how Faresay protects the data it processes, establishes accountability for security and data protection, and demonstrates — for UK GDPR Article 32 and, on US launch, the HIPAA Security Rule — that Faresay implements appropriate technical and organisational measures (TOMs) proportionate to the risk to individuals.

1.2 Scope

This policy applies to: - All Faresay personnel: employees, founders, contractors, and any worker with access to Faresay systems or data. - All Faresay information systems and services, including the marketplace application, supporting infrastructure, code repositories, administrative tooling, and corporate accounts (email, collaboration tools). - All data processed by Faresay, with mental-health data / Protected Health Information (PHI) treated as the highest-sensitivity class (Section 2). - Third parties and sub-processors that process Faresay data on Faresay's behalf (Section 9).

1.3 Role boundary

Faresay provides the platform; the clinician provides the clinical service and owns the clinical relationship and clinical record (see CONTEXT.md and the Therapist Agreement). The split of data-protection roles — controller / processor / joint controller (UK/EU) and covered entity / business associate (US HIPAA) — is being finalised by counsel and affects which obligations in this policy fall on Faresay versus the clinician. ⚠️ COUNSEL.


2. Data classification

Faresay classifies data so that controls are applied proportionately. Mental-health data is always treated at the highest level.

Class Examples Handling baseline
Class 1 — Highest sensitivity: mental-health data / PHI / special-category health data The fact a person is seeking or receiving therapy; intake/assessment information; session-related clinical information and notes; safeguarding/crisis information; messages relating to care. Strict least-privilege access; encryption in transit and at rest; full audit logging; no use in non-production environments; breach-notification regimes apply (Section 14).
Class 2 — Confidential Account & identity data; authentication data; payment-related data; clinician licensing/verification data; internal financials; security configuration. Role-based access; encryption in transit and at rest; logged access.
Class 3 — Internal Internal documents, non-sensitive operational data. Access limited to personnel; standard controls.
Class 4 — Public Marketing pages, published clinician profile information the clinician has agreed to publish. Integrity controls; no confidentiality requirement.

Notes: - Mental-health data is inherently sensitive. Even the bare fact that an individual is a Faresay client is Class 1 data and must be protected accordingly. - Where Faresay acts as a processor / business associate for clinical records, the clinician (as controller / covered entity) sets the lawful basis and permitted uses; Faresay processes only on documented instructions. ⚠️ COUNSEL. - Payment card data: Faresay intends to use a PCI-DSS-compliant payment processor so that Faresay does not store raw card data. [PLACEHOLDER: payment processor]. ⚠️ SECURITY — confirm cardholder-data flows and PCI scope.


3. Governance, roles & responsibilities

3.1 Accountability

Faresay's leadership (founder/management) is ultimately accountable for information security and data protection and for approving this policy.

3.2 Key roles

3.3 Decision-making & review

Security risks are tracked in the risk-register.md. Material security decisions, exceptions and accepted risks are recorded with an owner and review date.


4. Access control

4.1 Principles

4.2 Authentication

4.3 Joiner / mover / leaver (JML)


5. Encryption & key management

5.1 In transit

5.2 At rest

5.3 Key management


6. Infrastructure, hosting & data residency

6.1 Known stack (per CONTEXT.md)

6.2 Data residency ⚠️ COUNSEL


7. Secure software development lifecycle (SSDLC)


8. (Reserved — see Section 9 for third-party management)

Section intentionally consolidated into Section 9.


9. Third-party & sub-processor management

9.1 Inventory & due diligence

9.2 Contracts — DPAs and BAAs ⚠️ COUNSEL


10. (Reserved)

See Section 11.


11. Logging, monitoring & audit trails


12. Vulnerability management & penetration testing


13. Backup, disaster recovery & business continuity


14. Incident response & breach notification ⚠️ COUNSEL

14.1 Incident response

14.2 UK breach notification

14.3 US breach notification (on US launch)


15. Personnel security


16. Physical security


17. Acceptable use


18. Mapping to HIPAA Security Rule safeguards ⚠️ COUNSEL

The following maps this policy to the HIPAA Security Rule safeguard categories. This is a planning aid for US launch, not a confirmation of compliance, and assumes Faresay is a covered entity and/or business associate (to be confirmed). ⚠️ COUNSEL.

18.1 Administrative safeguards (45 CFR §164.308)

18.2 Physical safeguards (45 CFR §164.310)

18.3 Technical safeguards (45 CFR §164.312)

⚠️ COUNSEL / SECURITY — a full HIPAA Security Rule gap assessment, risk analysis and documentation set must be completed before US launch.


19. Data retention, minimisation & secure disposal


20. Alignment to a recognised framework (future goal)

Faresay's security programme is structured to align over time with a recognised framework. As a bootstrapped, early-stage company, formal certification is a future goal rather than a current state. Candidate frameworks: - SOC 2 (Type II) — likely the most market-relevant signal for a US healthtech marketplace and enterprise/clinician trust. - ISO/IEC 27001 — internationally recognised ISMS certification. - NIST Cybersecurity Framework / NIST 800-53 — useful as a control reference.

⚠️ SECURITY — agree the target framework and a realistic roadmap (likely: implement controls now, pursue SOC 2 around US launch).


21. Policy review cadence

Version Date Author Notes
v0.1 (DRAFT) [PLACEHOLDER: date] [PLACEHOLDER: author] Initial draft for security + legal review.

End of draft. ⚠️ This document is a v0.1 draft and must be validated by qualified security and legal professionals, with all [PLACEHOLDER: …] items resolved, before it is relied upon or published.